This study focused on the Effect of Total Physical Response
Method on Student’s Achievement in English Vocabulary in Junior Secondary
Schools in Akoko South Education Zone of Ondo State. Three research questions
were posed and three null hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. The
study engaged quasi-experimental research design, otherwise known as pretest –
posttest non-equivalent control group design involving two intact classes from
each of the randomly selected schools. Purposive random sampling was used to
select two schools for the study. The two intact classes randomly selected were
assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group comprised
83 male and female students from schools located in rural and urban areas. The
control group comprised 77 male and female students from rural and urban areas.
The experimental group was taught English vocabulary using Total Physical
Response method while the control group was taught English Vocabulary using
Grammar-Translation method. The instrument which was validated by experts’ and
used for data collection was English Vocabulary Achievement Test (EVAT). Four
different lesson plans for the two groups with the same instructional
objectives and questions but different teaching strategies were developed. EVAT
was administered to 20 students before the treatment for the purpose of
estimating the reliability of the instrument. The internal consistency of the
instrument was determined using Kuder-Richardson’s formula (K – 20) and it
yielded a reliability index of 0.75.
Data collected were calculated using mean and standard deviation
to answer the research questions while the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was
used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The major
findings of the study were: Total Physical Response method had a significant
effect on students’ achievement in English vocabulary. Student taught English
vocabulary with TPR method achieved significantly higher than their
counterparts taught with grammar translation method. School location had a
significant effect on students’ achievement in English vocabulary. Also, gender
had significant effect on students’ achievement in English vocabulary. Based on
these findings, it was concluded that the study provided empirical evidence of
the efficiency of TPR method in enhancing students’ achievement in English
Language Vocabulary. It was recommended that the serving teachers should be
encouraged to adopt this method as alternative to conventional method of
teaching English language vocabulary. Also, students should be encouraged to
engage in extensive vocabulary activities with the aid of total physical
Background of the Study
Communication, from time immemorial, has been a major means of passing
information to people in every human community. It is a means of exchanging
ideas and disseminating information to the appropriate quarter and area.
According to Fawehinmi (2007:224) “communication is the “process” by which
thoughts, views, opinions are transferred from one end to the other”.
Communication is seen as a process because it changes human beings and tailors
their behaviour towards expected outcomes. It is an important instrument that
can be used to change human orientation. Nevertheless, it is observed that the use
of language cannot be separated from communication and communication itself
cannot be absolutely possible without the inclusion of language (Jimoh, 2007).
Language is an
integral part of communication. Language as a means of communication plays many
important roles among human beings in their day-to-day interactions and
communications. According to Onyekwere, Chibueze, Roscolette, Matins &
Quinette (2012, p. 3), “language is human specific in that it is a human
activity. It is exclusive to human beings. Although animals communicate, such
communication is not through speech or language”. Language is specific to human
beings because it is used to carry out series of functions among human beings
and can only be learned by human beings. There are some theories that underline
how language can be acquired or learned. These theories were developed to
account for language acquisition and learning. Some of them include
behaviourist- “say it after me”, mentalist- “it is all in your mind”,
connectionist- “it is associative”, interactionist- “linguistic environment
interacting with innate capacity”, among others.
Consequently, after the acquisition or learning, humans use language
voluntarily to convey information, to influence others, to keep records, to
document some ideas, to express themselves and to interact for phatic
communication. Basically, language affects human endeavours and manifests
itself in every facet of human life and activity (Fawehinmi, 2007). It is in
light of this statement that various language policies have been made in
Nigeria with regards to medium of instructions in our various institutions of
learning. The language policy on education (2004) stated in Ibemesi (2012, p.
444), states that;
… the languages are grouped under official, Nigerian and
foreign languages. Under official languages, English, designated (L4)
stands alone, while L1 to L3 designated,
Nigerian languages are classified as: Mother Tongue (L1), language
of the immediate community (L2) and major Nigerian languages as (L3)
respectively. French and Arabic are classified as foreign languages and
designated both as (L5).
The implication of this policy is that it makes mother tongue or
language of the immediate community (if any) compulsory in the lower primary
school, while English is compulsory from the senior primary school to secondary
English as one of the international languages of the world is indispensable
because of its global status. According to Yang (2005), English language is not
only a system of communication but the pre-eminent language of science,
technology and medicine and it has become the Lingua Franca in the 21st
century. Its trend of communication revolves global recognition. People all
over the world, today, are learning it either as a second language or foreign
language to enhance their potential for international communication. According
to Denham and Lobeck (2010, p.420), “Today, fewer than one-fifth of native
English Speakers live in the British Isles”. This means that many native speakers
of English are not from British Isles.
In Nigeria today, English is adopted as national and official language at the
expense of the so-called major languages: Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba because of
multilingual nature of this country. Consequently, there are objectives that
underline the learning of English language in Nigeria as stated in Enaibe and
Imonivwerha (2007): to produce Nigerian students whose spoken and written
English is intelligible locally, nationally and internationally; to enable
students to talk and write on prepared or impromptu topics with professional
competence; to make students speak at normal speed with good pronunciation,
stress, rhythm and intonation and to ensure high level of English skills with
special emphasis on spoken forms. Based on these objectives, therefore, it is
important that students achieve a high level of proficiency and intelligibility
for them to be enlisted into the elite circle because English is a language of
For students to be proficient and intelligible, vocabulary
language is needed (Scarborough, 2001). Vocabulary constitutes the knowledge of
meanings of words possessed by individual learners. It is the body of words
known to individuals. Yenny (2007, p.10) states; “vocabulary is a stock of
words in a language, written or spoken, with meaning considered as cultural
meaning used by group or individual community”. With this statement, the number
of vocabulary (words) in the linguistic repertoire of every learner determines
his competence and performance. Learners’ achievement on every aspect of
English as in essay writing, comprehension, summary, lexis and structure is
premised on the number of vocabulary they possess. It is believed that the more
vocabulary students learn; the more ideas they should have, so that they can
communicate their ideas more effectively. This view is supported by Edge (1993,
p.27), “knowing a lot of words in a foreign language is very important. The
more words we know, the better our chance of understanding or making ourselves
Most often, speaking and writing in the target language is a complex-task.
Internalizing chunks of vocabulary necessary for communication may be
time-consuming and demanding. Teaching English vocabulary in the junior
secondary school should be encompassing and different from adults’ learning
method. The teacher should make use of flash cards, vocabulary drills, language
games, reading comprehension exercises, oral exercises and repetition to help
the students develop the four language skills in the target language. The
teacher must play important roles by motivating the students’ learning
interest. According to Harmer (2001, p.38) “young learners especially those up
to the ages of nine to twelve learn differently from older learners,
adolescents and adults. They easily get bored, loosing interest after ten
minutes or so”. This view is also stressed by Diego (2010), in his study on
learning vocabulary through total physical response who observes that
vocabulary learning is one of the most complex but important area when teaching
English. It is the area of language learning needed to be taught on regular
basis. The areas such as common prefixes and suffixes, plurals, parts of
speech, word recognition, root of words and homonyms should be given adequate
attention by the teacher to realize the aims of vocabulary teaching and
Thus, the aim of teaching English vocabulary at the junior secondary school
level is to motivate, prepare and make students have self confidence in
listening, speaking, reading and writing as well as learning English in the
senior secondary school and higher institutions. To make them also, understand
simple idiomatic expressions while communicating with native and non-native
speakers of English.
Despite these aims that underline the teaching of English vocabulary, students
often find it difficult to express themselves clearly in the target language.
This statement is invigorated by WAEC (West African Examination Council) Chief
Examiner report (2008, p.7),
… the passages dealt with subject matters that are familiar and
range of vocabulary was appropriate within the candidates ability to
comprehend. Despite the appropriateness of diction and the familiarity of the
subject matter, many candidates lifted their answers mindlessly from the
passage. Such candidates revealed not only a lack of understanding of the
questions but also an inability to re-state the ideas of the passage briefly in
The report stated that the poor knowledge of students in the four language
skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing) contributed to their poor
performance. Inadequate vocabulary to restate the ideas in the passage briefly
in their own expression despite the use of vocabulary suitable to the students’
level of understanding was another area of poor performance in the two
comprehension passages. The report further stated that the candidates’
expression was generally poor and their range of vocabulary was so limited.
They lack adequate vocabulary to restate the ideas in the passages briefly
using their own expressions. The need, therefore, arises to find out the causes
of the students’ poor achievement in their examination and the use of the
English language in their everyday communicative purposes.
Many things can hinder students’ academic achievement. These problems can be
traced to teachers and their teaching methods, learning environment and gender.
Augustine (2013), observes that non-enhancement of teaching with modern
teaching resources, inadequate coverage of course contents, teachers’
inadequacy to teach effectively and inability to assimilate what teachers teach
students are problems facing teaching and learning of English language. In view
of this statement, it can be inferred that these same problems are facing
vocabulary teaching and learning. Ray (2007), opines that vocabulary is a
complex area of language learning, therefore, the best way to learn it is to
use appropriate method and assign long period each day to focus on its direct
teaching. Conversely, teachers often avoid teaching it on regular basis because
its teaching makes little meaning to them. They see it as unimportant area of
language learning and whenever they teach it, they use method that is not
innovative and practical oriented (Ray, 2007).
There is general belief that method chosen by English language teachers to a
large extent determines students’ achievement in the language. Many writers
hold the view that method of teaching is indispensable in the teaching-
learning process of English as a second language. This view is reinforced by
Bolunde (2005), stresses that the teaching method used by the English language
teacher can affect student positively because it is a weapon of enhancing the
language ability of his students. There are many teaching methods; these
include Grammar Translation Method (GTM), Audio-Lingual Method (ALT), Direct
Method (DM), Eclectic Method (EM), Communicative Language Teaching Method (CLTM),
etcetera. All these methods are conventional teaching methods. They are methods
that involve teacher in complete verbal instruction or expression.
Communication flows from teacher to students (Anyima, 2011). They stress on the
knowledge of language than use. Azikiwe (1998), observes that, in conventional
teaching methods, students learn the speech sounds like parrots. Students are
expected to internalize the rules of the target language through
Most teachers have been using Grammar-Translation Method where learning
instructions are presented to the students through verbal explanation in the
mother tongue. The method emphasizes the development of writing ability and
thereby neglects the development of speaking skill. Pei (2004), states that, in
Grammar-Translation method, the aim is for student to read prominent literary
texts and to write in the target language. The focus is on the teacher and
learning activity is silent and passive. Learning takes place by using
Teachers are found not to be instrumental and skillful while using the method.
The classroom is always boring because the method is teacher-centred. Opinmi
(2007), observes that the method the teachers use is boring and cannot arouse the
students’ learning interest and thereby result in sleeping, chatting and moving
out of the students from the classroom.
In using the Grammar-Translation method to teach vocabulary in Junior Secondary
Schools, the teacher devotes the whole lesson period to explain the vocabulary
items using mother tongue. There are no practical strategies such as flash
cards and word games that will stick the vocabulary items into the students’
memory. Throughout the lesson period, there will be no attempt made by the
teacher to enable the students practise the vocabulary items in context and
situation. The students, therefore, become passive rather than active in
classroom activities. Since other methods and Grammar-Translation method have
failed in the teaching of English vocabulary, the need therefore arises to
encourage the use of Total Physical Response method which is learner-centred
and practical oriented.
The method was developed by James Asher, a professor of psychology at San Jose
State University in 1965 (Knight, 2001). It is a teaching method that demands
students to respond physically to imperative (commands) given by the teacher,
who has planned these commands in a way that the linguistic items (words) to be
learned are covered. The teaching and learning of vocabulary using TPR is
usually carried out step by step. According to Bahasa (2012), the following
steps can be used to teach vocabulary with TPR method.
Step I: The method is briefly explained
to the students by the teacher in mother tongue as well as the target language
so that students will understand what they have to do.
Step II: Some
students are asked by the teacher to come out. They come out and sit down with
the teacher on the chairs lined up in front of the class. The students are the
models to other students in the class. The command is given by the teacher and
the action is also performed by the teacher while all the students listen and
watch the teacher’s command and action.
Step III: The action of the command
given by the teacher is performed by the students in front of the class while
other students listen and watch the teacher and their colleagues’ command and
Step IV: The action of the command
given by the teacher is performed by the remaining students in the class.
Step V: One of
the students sitting down in front of the class is asked by the teacher to
perform the action based on the command.
Step VI: The action
is revised by the teacher or the students are asked by the teacher to give the
command to each other (in pair)
Moreover, every vocabulary item to be learned by the students will be explained
by the teacher in form of command. Command is an instruction (word or phrase)
given to the students by the teacher base on the vocabulary items under
teaching (Knight, 2001). This command is supported by the teacher’s action on
each vocabulary (word or phrase). The teacher does it so as to help the
students understand each vocabulary. In other words, each vocabulary is
presented to the students through command and it is reinforced by the teacher’s
action on the vocabulary. The teacher, however, uses his body to support the
verbal explanation of the vocabulary (word or phrase). For instance, if the
teacher gives command on vocabularies like ‘headlights’ and ‘u-turn’, the
teacher explains them and support the explanation with body actions or gestures
in order to demonstrate what headlights and u-turn are all about. This command
is as emphasized as Asher regards language as “grammar based” with the verb
used in the command being the central idea (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
However, this does not mean that verbs are only elements or words in given
commands (sentences). One of the goals of using TPR is to help the students
develop listening fluency (Asher, 1965). The other language skills like
speaking and writing, are supposed to be learned in a later stage as Asher
believes that the ability to understand a language by listening to it, would
later have a positive effect on building the other skills like reading. Other
goals are: teaching oral proficiency at a beginning level, using comprehension
as a means of speaking and using action-based drills in the imperative form
(Yenny, 2007). Nevertheless, there are many learning activities that teacher
can use Total Physical Response (TPR). They include exercise by using command;
conservational dialogue; role playing as well as reading and writing
Subsequently, Total Physical Response (TPR) as a teaching method is based on some
language acquisition and learning theories. They include behaviourist theory
that emphasizes learning through imitation, practice, reinforcement and habit
formulation (Lightbown and Spada, 2006). Others are; Krashen’s input hypotheses
and mentalist theory. Similarly, there are some advantages attributed to TPR.
It creates positive thinking which in turn facilitates the students’
involvement in learning process; it develops verbal behaviour and makes
communication easy. TPR also enables the students to understand meanings of
words in real context and makes students to involve in activities with little
However, TPR has been used to carry out studies on listening and
speaking skills as well as on verb. These studies were carried out by Pei
(2004) and Bahasa (2012) respectively. These researchers gave credit to the
effectiveness of TPR. Hence, the researcher wants to investigate whether
exposure to TPR will have any effect on the achievement of junior secondary
school students in English vocabulary.
Apart from method, school location is another important variable to look at, in
this study. There are many literatures on the effect of school location and
learners’ background on their academic achievement. Some researchers believe
that students from urban area are better than those from rural area in their
academic achievement. School location can be referred to the place where school
is situated. It is where teaching- learning process takes place. It can either
be rural or urban location. Differences in school location imply the existence
of differences in demographic and socio-economic parameters of the students
(Ezema, 2002). In his view, Owoeye (2002), opines that urban students perform
better than their rural counterparts in all forms of achievement test. Axtel
and Bowers (1972), confirm that students from rural areas perform significantly
better than their urban counterparts in verbal aptitude, English Language and
total scores using the National Common Entrance as a base. These controversies
call for further investigation. The researcher, therefore, intends to find out
the effectiveness or otherwise of school location on students’ academic
Apart from school location, gender difference is another
important variable to look at, in this study. Gender has been emphasized to
have effect on students’ academic achievement. Jadesola (2002), opines that
gender is socially constructed for the purpose of allocating powers, duties,
responsibility, status, roles in any social context. Gender is the disparity
observable between male and female in terms of power, position and achievement
in a particular context or field of study. Gender achievement has become an
age-long debate in the field of language. Some linguists are in support of
female outperforming male, while some are in support of male outperforming
female. Whitney (2006), opines that female students outperform male students in
almost all indices of achievement related to language skills. Conversely, Lynn
(2004), states that male students have larger brain size than female students
and therefore, would be expected to have higher average performance in picture
vocabulary. As a result of these arguments, there is need for further research.
The researcher is, however, interested in finding out whether gender has any
effect on students’ academic achievement.
Based on the previous studies, the effects of Total Physical
Response (TPR), school location and gender on students’ academic achievement
seem to be inconsistent and contradictory. This calls for continuous and
further research on effect of TPR on students’ academic achievement from time
to time and place to place. So also, effect of gender and school location on
students’ academic achievements should also be carried out regularly.
Consequently, the aim of this study is to find out the effectiveness or
otherwise of TPR, location and gender on students’ academic achievement. This
study, therefore, is designed to determine the effects of Total Physical
Response on students’ achievement in English vocabulary in junior secondary
schools in Akoko South Education Zone.
Statement of the Problem
The importance of English language cannot be undermined in everyday
communicative activities. One of the objectives of teaching and learning of
English language in Nigeria emphasizes training and producing students whose
spoken and written English is intelligible locally, nationally and
Nevertheless, Nigerian students still find it difficult to communicate with
English language despite these underlying objectives. Failure in this subject
has been attributed to the methods and strategies of teaching vocabulary which
is an important area in English Language. Another observation made is the
limited vocabulary which the students possess in their speech repertoire.
Previous report from WAEC Chief Examiners noted that in the comprehension
section, most candidates usually exhibited poor understanding by giving the
surface meaning of the passage due to limited vocabulary.
English language vocabulary teaching is presumably characterized by
conventional teaching methods. They include Grammar-Translation method,
Audio-Lingual method among others. Grammar-Translation method involves verbal
explanation of the teacher in mother tongue. Learners are made passive because
the method does not allow them to be active in the delivery of the lesson. This
method may have likely been the bane of students’ poor achievement in some
aspects of English language like essay writing, lexis and structure.
Therefore, there have been consistent in reports of poor achievement in English
langue among Nigerian students over the years. Considering the need to improve
students’ achievement in English vocabulary, the present study intended to
investigate the effect which Total Physical Response would have on junior
secondary school students’ achievement in English language vocabulary.
Purpose of the Study
The general purpose of the study was to determine the effects of Total Physical
Response on students’ achievement in English language vocabulary. Specifically,
the study was to:
Determine the effect of Total Physical Response on the students’
mean achievement in English vocabulary using Total Physical Response method and
Grammar Translation Method
Determine the effect of school location on the students’ mean
achievement in English vocabulary if taught with Total Physical Response method.
Determine the effect of gender on the students’ mean achievement
in English vocabulary if taught with Total Physical Response method.
Significance of the Study
The findings of the study are expected to contribute theoretically and
practically to the teaching and learning of English vocabulary. Theoretically,
the study will hinge on behaviorist theory. It will hopefully recognize that
vocabulary is hinged on behaviorist theory. It will hopefully encourage
successful interactions between teachers and students in the classroom through
the use of imitation, practice, gesture and performance. It will hopefully make
teachers to be facilitators and make the leaning situation students-centered
for impactful output.
Practically, the study will hopefully be of help to language teachers,
students, educators, curriculum planners, policy makers, administrators,
textbook writers, institutions of learning and the general public. The findings
of the study will help the English language teachers to use Total Physical
Response in teaching the English language vocabulary. It will also, help them
to use the method to teach other skills of English in order to realize the aim
of second language learning.
The findings of the study hopefully will stimulate students to learn English
vocabulary with TPR method. It will also make vocabulary learning enjoyable.
Students will get themselves familiar with the meanings of the vocabulary items
they want to learn. It will hopefully improve their mastery of the English
language vocabulary. The findings will as well engender other researchers
to embark on further researches on the effect of TPR method on vocabulary
teaching and learning.
Finally, it is hopeful that the result of the study will help
educators, curriculum planners, policy makers, administrators to project the
effective method that will bring greater achievement in English vocabulary. It
will also be an asset to textbook writers, institutions of learning and general
public in addressing all issues that have to do with the teaching and learning
of English as a second language (ESL) in Nigeria.
Scope of the Study
The study was carried out in Akoko South Education Zone, Ondo State. The study
focused on Junior Secondary School two (JSS II) students in Akoko South
Education Zone. The choice of JSS two (JSS II) was made because the students’
performance in vocabulary in this area is very poor. The researcher intended to
investigate the effect of TPR on students’ achievement in English vocabulary in
The study covered the following content areas; vocabulary, synonym and antonym
as well as vocabulary items such as registers, idioms and phrasal verbs. The
vocabulary items were selected from Junior Secondary School Certificate
Examination (JSSCE) past questions. Grammar-Translation method was used
for the control group while TPR was used for the experimental group to carry
out the experiment. The variables of school location and gender were considered
on Total Physical Response Method.
The following research questions were used to guide the study.
What is the effect of Total Physical Response on students’
achievement in English language vocabulary?
What effect does school location have on students’ mean
achievement in English vocabulary using Total Physical Response method?
What effect does gender have on students’ mean achievement in
English vocabulary using Total Physical Response method?
following null hypotheses guided the study and were tested at probability level
There will be no significant difference in the mean achievement scores of
students taught English vocabulary with Total Physical Response method and
those taught with Grammar-Translation method.
There will be no significant difference in the mean achievement scores of
students from rural and urban schools if taught English vocabulary using Total
Physical Response method.
There will be no significant difference in the mean achievement scores of male
and female students if taught English vocabulary using Total Physical Response