The Advanced
Distributed Learning (ADL) initiative of the U.S. Government is unifying
e-learning specifications emerging from the international standards
organizations into a single specification referred to as the Sharable Object
Content Reference Model, or SCORM. Today, this specification is now the
de-facto standard for e-learning content developed for the Department of
Defense and other federal agencies. These standards are stimulating the rapid
development of learning repositories. Once deployed, these have the potential
of dramatically changing the use of elearning in engineering education and in
the continuing education of practicing engineers. This paper discusses SCORMTM
and other e-learning standards and the impact they are having on developing
reusable learning content. The implications of these developments on
engineering education and the opportunities they afford for the future
education of engineers are also discussed. The Need for E-learning Standards
Standards Propel E-learning Innovations E-learning, as we think of it today,
dates to the early 1990’s during which time software systems for managing
e-courses, such as WEST, WebCT and Blackboard, were being developed and
marketed. Before that time, the idea of conducting university courses on the
Internet was only an afterthought. However, once HTML standards became accepted
by the W3C committee, user-friendly web browsers and authoring tools were
rapidly brought to market. In a real sense, this started a revolution in
education that continues today. Before the adoption of a single HTML standard
by the W3C in 1992, companies were reluctant to invest in the development of
browsers and authoring tools that would become obsolete once a standard was
adopted. A similar situation recently existed for XML, an evolving standard for
the communication of information via the Internet. The W3C adopted the first
XML standard in 1998. Shortly after that time, Microsoft upgraded their browser
to support this standard. Netscape Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual
Conference, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, March 20 – 22, 2002.
Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education followed shortly
with a similar upgrade. Today, the XML standard is again launching a revolution
in Internet communications. In the 1990’s, Internet standards for HTML, XML,
CSS and multimedia content stimulated innovations in e-learning. In the same
way, the next revolution in e-learning is on the horizon. New standards are
being developed key international organizations for sharing e-learning content
across different platforms and different learning management systems. E-course
Reusability & Copyrights In the late 1990’s faculty speculated whether
e-courses could reduce education costs. Some speculated that although the costs
associated with building high-quality e-courses was high, educational costs
might be reduced by conducting large e-courses. One faculty member might be
able to teach a larger class. Although cost benefits have been documented in
web-assisted traditional classes, the same benefits are yet to be realized in
most online courses. Even in those cases where the topic and instructional
design of a course permits teaching it with a higher student teacher ratio, the
costs associated with building and maintaining course content are still very
high. Some universities are responding by increasing the resources for building
e-courses. Some, such as the Texas A&M System, have implemented copyright
policies for governing ecourses developed by their faculty. These copyrights
are seen as inherently valuable. The expectation is that this e-learning
content can be reused for many years. Development costs for an ecourse in a
core subject, such as engineering calculus, can be amortized over several
years. However without e-learning standards, this assumption is unrealistic.
Increased expectations of students for higher quality e-learning experiences,
the emergence of new technology, and improvements in Internet bandwidth are
happening so quickly that most university e-courses need redeveloping every 3-4
years. E-courses require significant rebuilding to take advantage of
technological improvements to remain competitive in the race to produce quality
e-learning experiences, even if their content is substantially unchanged. Large
collections of e-learning content can also be lost when learning management
systems are changed. Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, for example,
recently switched learning management systems after a researching the
advantages and disadvantages of competing systems. Most learning management
systems, such as Blackboard and WebCT use proprietary database formats that
make it very difficult or impossible to transfer learning content from one
system to another or to reuse previously developed content in other courses.
Moving a course between systems can be more costly than just redeveloping that
course in the new system. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual
Conference, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, March 20 – 22, 2002.
Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Today it is very
difficult or impossible to transfer learning content from one LMS to another.
There is a clear need for a common data exchange format for learning content.
In the current environment, significant investments in developing e-learning
content in engineering make little sense if it is developed specifically for
delivery on a specific LMS. Collaborative Development of E-courses Similarly,
differences between learning management systems make it difficult for authors
to collaborate on e-course projects. This can not only increase the total cost
of building e-courses, it can also lower the quality of the course. The better
courses require a considerable investment in authoring and development time.
Often the content expert, author, is not the person with the technical
expertise to encapsulate this content into an online course. Without e-learning
standards, authors collaborating on developing an e-course need to ensure that
they either restrict their content development to standards-based technology,
such as hypertext, or ensure that their learning management systems can share
learning content. Universities are recognizing the inherent value of
high-quality online courses developed by their faculty. The Texas A&M
System, for example, is looking at the collaborative development of learning
content for courses being taught at nearly every campus. These are the core
courses in engineering, mathematics, sciences, English, etc. The syllabus for
these courses is very similar from one campus to another, and each campus has
content experts that can share on a team to develop high quality learning
content for these courses. Until now this content has been developed
independently at each campus. Collaboration in developing learning content for
these courses not only lowers development costs and shortens development time,
it can also result in higher quality courses. However, the collaborative
development of courses is very difficult without a standard for sharing that
content from one campus to another. The general lack of international standards
for packaging e-courses adversely impacts the development of university
e-courses in several ways: 1. Since content developed without standard is
difficult to reuse in other courses, it contributes to increased development
costs. 2. E-course copyrights for e-courses of core content are of little value
since they are likely to be obsolete in a few years when learning management
systems or Internet technology change. 3. Author collaboration on e-course
development is difficult without e-course standards. SCORM SCORM History The
federal government spends millions of dollars each year to develop e-learning
content, including online courses, courses distributed on CD’s and intranets.
In the 1990’s the government recognized that it was difficult to reuse this
content. The Department of Defense, for example, found that the various
branches of the military had developed e-learning content on similar topics,
such as Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, March 20 – 22, 2002. Copyright 2002,
American Society for Engineering Education management and acquisition rules.
Even though those courses essentially covered the same content, it was nearly
impossible to share e-content between military branches because they were
developed without a common standard, and they were not designed for reuse in
other courses. The government also realized the benefits of an international standard
for e-content on the training industry. A common international standard for
sharing learning content would stimulate an international learning economy,
similar to the economy that is developing around the Internet. If standards
allow for reusing learning content developed for one course, then learning
content will become a commodity. As a result, in 1997, the Department of
Defense and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy launched
the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) initiative. Its primary goal is to
develop a learning economy by providing access to high-quality education and
training material, easily tailored to individual learner needs and available
whenever and wherever needed.