ABSTRACT
An appraisal of tax collection system in Nigeria. The aim
and objective of the topic is to critically analyze the assessment and
collection procedure of tax in Nigeria. To identify the problems militating
against assessment and collection procedure, to know the possible effects of
improving assessment and collection recommendation for an effective and
efficiency means of assessment and collection of taxes. Finally, to make useful
suggestion and advices the government based on the findings.
The significant of this study is that though tax is a
nationwide phenomenon, the scope of this study is intended to cover only Imo
state; the tax laws in Imo state and the various types of taxes in operation.
Taxation as one of major sources of revenue to the
unsuccessful implementation of economic policies on collection procedures for
the government. Fraud as one of the problem because most of tax payers in
Nigeria falsify their records so as not to be declare high profit and pay high
tax . Also most of the taxpayers’ money cannot be accounted for. At times when
taxes paid, the tax officials don’t give the government all the monies they
reserve some for themselves.
The techniques used in the formulation of the hypothesis are
the statistical method which is the chi-0square method was chosen to help in
interpretation of the data collection during investigation. The null hypothesis
(Ho) is used to determine its acceptance and or otherwise the acceptance of the
alternative hypothesis (H1).
The findings in all the project is that the assessment and
collection in Nigeria is not effective.
Secondary is that the response of taxpayers in Nigeria
connive with tax officials to evade tax.
The researcher’s recommendations in order to boost the
present tax collection system in Nigeria is to increase the revenue generated
through tax improve tax payers confidence in the government and willingness to
pay tax.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page-
– – –
– – –
– – -i
Certification-
– – –
– – –
– – -ii
Dedication- – –
– – – –
– – -iii
Acknowledgment-
– – –
– – –
– -iv
Abstract- –
– – –
– – –
– – -v
Table of contents-
– – –
– – –
– -vi
Chapter one
Introduction – –
– – –
– – –
-1
Back ground of the study-
– – –
– -2
Statement of the problem-
– – –
– -4
Objectives of the study-
– – –
– – -5
Research questions-
– – –
– – -6
Statement of hypothesis-
– – –
– -7
Significant of the study- –
– – –
– -8
Scope of the study-
– – –
– – -9
Limitation of the study- –
– – –
– -10
Definition of terms-
– – –
– – -10
Chapter two
2.0 Literature review-
– – –
– – –
-13
Introduction- –
– – –
– – –
-13
Review of tax laws in Nigeria- –
– – –
-13
Canons of taxation –
– – —
– – -14
Provision of income tax management Act (ITMA)- -16
Nigeria tax legislature
– –
– – –
– 17
The various types of taxes and their legal back -18
Important of taxation
– – –
– – -19
Federal Board of Inland revenue- –
– – -20
state board of Inland revenue- –
– – -23
Local government revenue committee- – –
-25
Nigeria tax structure-
– – –
– – – 25
Definition/explanation of tax terminology29
Assessment of persons and partners- –
– -40
The concept of value added tax- –
– – -41
Vatable persons in Nigeria-
– – –
– -48
Chapter three
3.0 Research Design and Methodology – –
– – -50
Introduction- –
– –
– – –
– -50
Research design sources/methods of data collection-50
Sources of data
– – –
– – –
-51
Population and sample size-
– – –
– -52
Sample technique- –
– – –
– – -54
Validity and reliability of measuring instrument- -54
Method of data analysis-
– – –
– – – 56
Chapter four
4.0 Presentation and analysis of data- –
– – -65
Introduction- – –
– – –
– – -65
Presentation of data-
– – –
– – -65
Analysis of data-
– – –
– – –
-66
Test of hypothesis- –
– – –
– – -74
Interpretation of result- – –
– – –
-79
Chapter five
5.0 Summary conclusion and recommendations – – -81
5.1 Introduction-
– – –
– – –
– -81
5.2 summary of findings-
– – –
– – –
– 81
5.3 Conclusions-
– – –
– – –
– -82
5.4 Recommendations – –
– – –
– – -83
5.5 recommendation for further studies – –
– -90
References – –
– – –
– – –
-91
Appendix- – –
– – –
– – –
– -93
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
As a matter of fact, accounting is not very new in the
history of men. Anywhere and whenever economic activities have progressed
beyond the most elementary conditions of service and production, the accounts
system have appeared. As far back as 4500BC, accounts system have been found,
hence Greek, Romans, Egyptians, early European and medieval accounting records
are in existence. In fact man have used accounting recording at any stage of
his development according to their needs.
Accounting environment has undergone vast changes ion the
past and an accelerating rate of change is in prospect for the future. As at
today what is been accepted as accounting would have been recognized as such
fifty years ago, as such, one may safely predict that in fifty or more years
time, the subject will bear little resemblance to what it is today. Accounting
from the view point of American Accounting Association (AAA, 1996) they defined
it thus: “is the process of identifying, measuring and communicating economic
information to permit informed judgment and decision by the users of
information”. Well according to the Bible, “church” is defined as “the body,”
which Christ is the head. Therefore, church is assembly of citizens that
acknowledge Jesus Christ as their supreme ruler. Church as an organization
possessed the characteristics of non-profit making. B.N Okezie, FCA (2000)
Defined non-profit making organization as those that possess following
characteristics:
“Non-profit making organization thereby non-trading and non
service rendered except to their members and having their major source of
funding through subscription from such members.
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The primary objective of the churches, though non-profit
maximization but this churches realized revenue as they meet for fellowship
through tithes, offering, donations, persuasions etc, this revenue as a matter
of facts, have to be properly accounted for, hence the members may wish to know
if this revenue are properly utilized by the management. On this note, there is
that need for accountability by the management hence nature demands that any
one who is given work to perform must be accountable to it. According to Kohe’s
Dictionary for accountants, 6th edition, he defined accountability as ‘the
obligation of an employee, agent, or other person to supply a satisfactory
report after periodic of action or of failure to act following delegate
authority”.
Accountability in this perspective is stewardship. As a
matter of fact, stewardship accounting has its origin in the function which
accounting serve from the earliest time in the history of our society.
Essentially, accountability can not be achieved without involving orderly
recording of the organization financial and non-financial transactions, and
this agrees with the accounting term “fairness”. “Adequacy and propriety” in
other words, the ability of financial statement to convey in ambiguous and
adequate information.
The word stewardship have been considered so important that
St. Luke Gospel chapter 16 verse 2, said “and he called him and said unto him,
how is it that I hear this? Give an account of the steward for thou sayest be
no longer steward”.
Therefore, if accountability and fairness is to be achieved
in any organization which includes church as a focus of this research, there
must be an adequate and constant accounting system.
At this point, we consider the word accounting system,
according to Eric L Kohler, he defined accounting system as: “The
classification of account, form, procedures and control by which assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and the result of transactions generally are
recorded and controlled”.
On this note, this research aim of examining the
accountability in churches. To know when they have general accepted accounting
principle different from the one used by profit making organizations.