CHAPTER
ONE
Introduction
The
civil service has always been the tool available to Nigerian government for the
implementation of developmental goals and objectives. It is seen as a pivot for
growth of Nigerian economy. It is responsible for the creation of an
appropriate and conducive environment in which the economy can perform
optimally and it is this catalytic role of the public service that propelled
government all over the world to search continuously for better ways to deliver
their services (Amoako, 2003).
Civil
Service is the instrument which government uses to regulate and manage all
aspects of the society. Thus, the condition of a society is largely determined
by the public service. Besides, it is from this government bureaucracy that all
the other institutions obtain various types of approval, license and permits
which are critical to their existence and operation. Also, government
allocations of resources pass through the bureaucracy to all other areas of the
society directly and indirectly. Therefore, all other institutions perforce
have to deal with the civil service at one point or the other in their
existence and operations (Philips, 1990).
There
have been several factors affecting the efficiency of the Nigeria civil
service. Ajayi (1998) has noted the following: over staffing and the closely
related poor remuneration of employees in public service as the key factors.
Secondly, there are the issues of poor assessment of manpower needs and the use
of wrong criteria to appraise staff performance. These two have led to poor
recruitment procedures, inadequate training and ineffective supervision. There
tends to be a lack of qualified technical support staff as opposed to the
abundance of general staff. The failure to carry out periodic assessment of
manpower needs of the various departments leads not only to uneconomic system
of compensation but also to inadequate job description and poor physical
working conditions.
There
has also been considerable political interference in the process of personnel
administration, leading to improper delegation of power, ineffective
supervision and corruption. The resulting apathy has in turn led to
unauthorized and unreasonable absenteeism, lateness, idleness and notably, poor
workmanship all which have serious negative implication on the efficiency and
productivity of the civil service. (Salisu, 2001).
The
federal government initiated reforms aimed at repositioning the civil service
for better efficiency and effectiveness. The reform of the public service
therefore became the ultimate strategy for repositioning the service for the
realization of their vision as part of a multi-sectorial approach to promoting
good governance, ensuring sustainable democracy and accelerated transformation.
Various policy initiative and legal instruments have been put in place for the
effectuation of the multi-sectorial reforms of the present administration, as
encapsulated in the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy, the
medium term development strategy document of the administration. Two of the
core components of the strategy relate to public service reforms and
anti-corruption reforms through the inculcation of a culture of transparency
and accountability (Adegoroye, 2005).
In spite of the gradual and systematic reforms and
restructuring since May 29, 1999, after decades of military rule, the civil
service is still considered stagnant and inefficient, and the attempts made in
the past by panels had little effects. One is bond to wonder why this is so.
Many writers have raised series of questions on the effectiveness of these
reforms on human resource management and improved service in the civil service.
Thus, a major preoccupation of the on-going government reforms is to restore
professionalism of the civil service and ensure effective service delivery. It
is in the light of this that this paper tries to analyze civil service reforms
and human resources development in Nigeria, a case study of Oyo State Civil
Service Commission
1.2. Statement of Problem
Successive governments in Nigeria have introduced
reforms aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the civil
service. Still, the service remains inefficient and incapable. It was observed
that most of these reforms did not take adequate care of human development,
poor implementation of the provisions of most of the reforms, political
interference among others.
In spite of the gradual and systematic reforms and
restructuring since May 29, 1999, after decades of military rule, the civil
service is still considered stagnant and inefficient, and the attempts made in
the past by panels had little effects. This therefore interest the researcher
in making attempts in finding possible solution to the worrisome situation of
the civil service in Nigeria.
1.3. Objectives of the Study
The
broad objective of the study is to evaluate the linkage between civil service reform and human resources
development in Nigeria, while the specific objectives are to: i. Examine the overall impact of administrative
reforms on human resources development in the Nigeria civil service.
ii. Evaluate the significance of reform in
the whole civil service.
iii. Analysis the challenges confronting civil
service toward achieving development in Nigeria
iv. Suggest possible recommendation towards
the development of human resources and civil service reforms in Nigeria.
1.4 Significance of the Study
It
is rightly observed that any research work is very essential to its area of
study and the society at large from its practical and theoretical aspect.
Hence, this research work will be
beneficial to the civil service most especially development handling results
both at the federal and state levels as well as all commission in government
parastatals. However, it will be useful to future researchers who may be interested
in this kind of research work.
1.5 Scope
of the Study
This study
examines the nexus between civil service reforms and human resources
development with particular emphasis on civil service commission, Oyo State.
The duration of the study is between 2013-2016.
1.6
Statement of the Hypothesis
Ho:
There is no relationship between civil service reform and human resources
development
in Nigeria.
Hi: There
is relationship between civil service reform and human resources development in
Nigeria.
Ho: Civil service reform plays no
significant role on human resources development in
Nigeria.
H1:
Civil service reform plays significant role on human resources development in
Nigeria.
Ho:
The civil service reforms in Nigeria do not make adequate provisions towards
human
resources development in Nigeria.
H1:
The civil service reforms in Nigeria make adequate provisions towards human
resources
development in Nigeria.
1.7
Limitations to the Study
These
are the possible problems the Researcher may face in the course of conducting
the research work which may include:
Financial
constraint
Every
good and successful research work requires sufficient finance. However, this
research work may face the problem of finance as a result of the little
financial resources at the disposal of the researcher.
Time constraint
The
conduct of all activities relating to the research work is time consuming
whereas the institution has specified limited time for the conduct of the
research work and this may limit the scope of the research work.
Problem of data collection
Data
collection may also pose threat to the research work. Every good research work
requires reliable and sufficient data. However, people always feel reluctant to
give out required information.
1.8. Definition of Operational Terms
Reform
Reform
is referred to as the change or amendment made a thing or organization. In the
civil service, reform is the series of change or amendment made to the
structure, administration and operation of the civil service aimed at improving
the structure and performance of the civil service
Public Service
The
term public service is broader and more inclusive. It refers to government
parastatals, which are the operational arm of government ministries as well as
the ministries, departments and agencies (MDA). The Public Service, in addition
to the Civil Service, encompasses the Armed Forces, the Judiciary, the Police,
Government Institutions, Parastatals; Government owned Companies and Statutory
Agencies.
Civil service
Civil
service usually refers to the functionaries of state who are appointed to their
government jobs through non-elective process. These functionaries work in the
main government Ministries and Extra-Ministerial Departments and are
responsible for the formulation and implementation of government policy and
programmes
Human Resources
Human
resources otherwise referred to as employee is the body of men and women
employed in an organization to handle a particular job or offer a service and
he or she is being paid for the job or service rendered. The human resources is
the body of people through the goal of an organization is accomplished
Human Resources Development
Human
resource development is the process or programmes designed to equip or upgrade
workers with up to date skills and knowledge towards handling their respective
responsibilities in a better ways
Commission
A
commission is a body or group of people officially constituted and tasked with
the responsibility of carrying out a particular or specific function
1.9. Historical Background of Oyo state Civil Service Commission
The
Civil service commission is a government agency that is constituted by
legislature to regulate the employment and working conditions of civil
servants, oversee hiring and promotions, and promotes the value of the public
service. It role is roughly synonymous to that of the human resources.
The
civil service commission is independent from elected politicians. Civil service
commission is an independent body established by government to deal with
establishment or personnel matter in the public service.
Function of civil service
commission
i. Establish rules and regulation:- To
adopt amend or repeal rule for the administration of the civil service system.
ii. Investigations:- To make investigations
either upon complaint or upon its own motion concerning any matter of aching
the administration of the civil service system.
iii. Appeals:- The civil service commission
shall prepared or cause to be prepared on written statement of fact, findings
and recommendations on every appeal and shall transmit a duplicate there of to
the person involved, and to the personnel officer.
Oyo State, popularly referred to as the “Pace
Setter” is one of the 36 States of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It came
into existence with the breakup of the old Western State of Nigeria during the
State creation exercise in 1976 and it originally included Osun State, which
was split off in 1991. Oyo State is homogenous, mainly inhabited by the Yoruba
ethnic group who are primarily agrarian but have a predilection for living in
high density urban centers.
The
Oyo State Service Commission is empowered by Law to provide equity in
employment, promotion and improvement in service delivery necessary to
actualize the vision of the civil service of the state. The charter refocused
on the commitment of the commission’s staff towards operational efficiency and effectiveness
in rendering quality service to the inhabitants of Oyo State.
Its
core functions are as derived from the constitution and relevant statutory
provisions include the following:-
-
Recruitment and selection for the civil
service including parastatals.
-
Appointment promotion and acting
appointment of civil servants.
-
Disciplinary control in the civil/public
service.
-
Retirement and removal of civil/public
officers.
-
Protection of pension benefit.
-
Issuance of service regulations.
-
Administration of staff performance
appraisal system.
-
Promotion of good governance, ethics and
integrity in the public service in accordance with the provisions of the public
service Ethics and code of conduct.
-
Human resource audit in the public
service including local authorities.
-
Administration of civil service
examination and occupational tests.
Administration Styles of Oyo State
Civil Service Commission
