CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Peer groups are among the most
influential social forces affecting adolescent behavior from mundane
decisions concerning clothing, hairstyle, music, and entertainment, to
more significant decisions concerning short and long-term education
plans. Variables of peer influence include the ethnicity of the
students, the socio-economic background of the students, family
relationships and group interests. During the adolescent years, peers
are even considered more important than parents, guardians and teachers
and the peer-influenced decisions of adolescents can have long-lasting
consequences. Parents recognize the importance of peer groups and
through their choice of neighborhoods, schools, and activities.
Peer effects in education are generally
accepted to be of importance. Despite this assertion, there is no
agreement on the direction of the effect peers have on one another.
Different theories attempt to explain this and according to some of them
the average ability of classmates has detrimental effect on one’s
schooling outcomes while others imply that it enhances ones achievements
(Marsh, 2005). Students could also be indirectly affected by their
peers. This usually comes about through the way teachers react to
different groups of students. One possible effect is that if students
are sorted into classes based on their potential this might allow
teachers to match instructions more closely to students needs because of
more homogenous group, which would benefit all students. However, my
primary purpose with this paper is to establish empirically the
existence and direction of peer effects but not to distinguish the
channels by which peer effects operate.
Aware of the importance of peer
influence, both families and policy makers have included peer quality as
a prominent element in educational decision making. For example,
parents tend to seek for better companions for their children through
residential choices and other school choice options. Many controversial
education policies, such as vouchers, school desegregation, and ability
tracking, intend to improve student performance through changing the
composition of peers. Nevertheless, trying to identify peer effects is
not an easy task. The most problematic issue is that families and
students usually choose schools and peer groups where they share similar
attributes with other members. Consequently, measures of peer features
may just signal other unobservable individual factors that as well
affect the outcomes, such as student willingness to work and parental
ambition and resources. This endogenous choice leads to a selection bias
problem. This creates a standard simultaneity bias problem, also termed
as reflection problem by Manski (1993).
A great body of research advocates the
positive peer impact represented in learning community, few studies were
conducted to reveal a negative dimension of peer effect on academic
performance (krik. A. Johnson, 2000). Communities are believed to absorb
individual’s sense of responsibility that is believed to contribute to
effective learning (J. Scott Armstrong, 2012). In social psychology,
such a diffusion of responsibility among the members of the community
results in social loafing making individuals exert less effort to
achieve a common goal than if they would do individually (Karau. Steven J
& Williams Kipling D, 1993, and Gilovich, T; Keltner, D &
Nisbett R. E, 2006). Such a failure of belonging and irresponsibility
have profound impact on students’ performance and continuous assessment.
Negative peer pressure has been found to be associated with lower
levels of school achievement nearly as much as they are with a Hispanic
or African-American minority group in the US (krik. A Johnson, 2000).
Consistent exposure to unhealthy company (e.g. bad roommate) can
likewise have a negative influence on academic achievement. A study on
peer effects and alcohol use among college students has shown that males
who were assigned a roommate who drank alcohol prior to college
obtained on average a lower GPA.
This contradiction in attribution as to
whether peers have positive or negative impact has been resolved in
Karau and Williams Collective Effort Model (1993, 2001). The model
suggests that highly motivated individuals generate social facilitation
(i.e. increasing one’s effort in the presence of others) whereas the
less motivated individuals are likely to engage in social loafing
(Forsyth, D. R, 2010). Moreover, Karau and Williams found that
motivation correlates with the complexity and value of the goal
(Forsyth, D. R, 2010); the more complicated a task is and the higher its
value, the more motivated the individuals become. It is widely believed
that peer group variables such as the ethnicity of the students, the
socio-economic background of the students, family relationships and
group interests have great impact on the academic performance of
students and that was what this study focused on with a keen interest on
Economics subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local
Government Area of Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Several researchers have been interested
in discussing the link between social interactions among peers in
school and academic outcomes for many years now. Several literatures
have established the fact that a child's peer group influences social
and academic development and that these influences begin at the very
start of formal education. Influences and motivations for all kinds of
children's behavior, including study habits and personal academic
development, come not only from their peers, but also from their
parents, teachers, and others with whom they come into close
contact. Because of the amount of the time a child spends each day with
his or her friends, the peer influence on a child can be very essential.
In addition, peer effects become more
important as time passes, peaking somewhere during
adolescence. Consequently, children must promote positive peer groups
early so as to become well-adjusted adolescents and possibly
adults.Having friends in school allows the child to learn a host of
skills: group interaction, conflict resolution, and trust building,
among others.Absence of positive peer group interactions brings about
serious social problems development. Peer rejection in early childhood
and early adolescence, for instance, is a good predictor of social and
academic problems later. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating
the impacts of peer group variables on academic performance in Economics
subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local Government Area of
Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria.
1.3 Research Questions
The following are some of the questions which this study intends to answer:
i) what is the
prevalence of peer group variables and academic performance in Economics
subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local Government Area?
ii) what are the effects
of peer group variables and academic performance in Economics subject
among secondary school students in Uyo Local Government Area?
iii) what efforts are
being taken by the parents of the students of secondary schools in Uyo
Local Government Area to ensure better academic performance in
Economics?
1.4 Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study was to
investigate the impacts of peer group variables on academic performance
in Economics subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local
Government Area of Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. The specific objectives
were:
i) to establish the
prevalence of peer group variables and academic performance in Economics
subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local Government Area
ii) to determine the
effects of peer group variables and academic performance in Economics
subject among secondary school students in Uyo Local Government Area
iii) to investigate the
efforts being taken by the parents of the students of secondary schools
in Uyo Local Government Area to ensure better academic performance in
Economics
1.5 Significance of the Study
This research work would
benefit the government of Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria, in developing and
implementing policies that promote student performance in relation to
peer influence. The study findings would also assist schools to
eradicate negative peer influence on Economics performance. It would
also help researchers as it would help develop new literature in the
area of Peer group variables and academic performance in Economics among
Secondary school Students in Uyo Local Government Area.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study investigated
the impact of Peer group variables and academic performance in Economics
among Secondary school Students in Uyo Local Government Area. The study
shall be concentrated to only students from Uyo Local Government Area.
1.7 Limitation of the study
The researcher was faced
with inadequate time however the researcher keenly followed the time
frame. The respondents were also shy about giving information thinking
it was for commercial purposes but they were assured of confidentiality.
Lastly it was not easy to get some respondents to respond to the
questions but the researcher was patient and made several trips to
collect the questionnaire.
1.8 Definitions of Terms
The following terms were used in the course of this study:
Academic Performance: Scores attained in form one end of year examination.
Economics: A social science subject that study human behaviour in buying and selling.
Peer group: A group of students in the same class.