ABSTRACT
The study attempted
to investigate the relationship between laboratories based instruction and
academic performance of students in the teaching of mathematics. In this study
relevant related literature review was carried out under sub-headings. The
research survey design was used in order to assess the opinions of the
respondents with the use of the questionnaire and the sampling technique. A
total of 120 (one hundred and twenty) respondents were sampled for the study.
Two null hypotheses were formulated and tested in this study, the independent
t-test for hypothesis one and three, while hypotheses was tested using the Pearson
product moment coefficient statistical tool at 0.05 level of significance. At
the end of the analysis, the following results emerged: that there is a
significant relationship between facilities and students’ academic performance
in the schools and here is a significant difference between the academic
performance of students who attended schools where there are facilities and
those whose schools do not have facilities. Based on the conclusion of the
study, the following recommendations were made thus: School authorities should
endeavour to supply adequate infrastructure to the schools, especially at the
secondary and primary school levels and Government should ensure that the
budgetary allocations for the educational sector are increased so as to enhance
the acquisition of infrastructures in the school so that teaching and learning
process will be improved upon.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract v
Table of contents vi
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1
Background to the Study 1
1.2
Statements of the Problem 4
1.3
Purpose of the Study 5
1.4
Research Questions 6
1.5
Research Hypotheses 6
1.6
Significant of the Study 7
1.7
Scope and Limitations of the Study 8
CHAPTER TWO: Literature Review 9
2.1
Concept of Education Facilities 9
2.2
Educational Facilities and Planning 10
2.3
Maintenance of The laboratory based instruction 15
2.4
Disparities Between Urban and Rural Areas in
Educational
Facilities 20
2.5
Maintenance Concepts: Rehabilitation Remodeling,
Modernization,
Replacement 21
2.6
Nature of Infrastructures in the School System 23
CHAPTER THREE:
Research Design and Methodology 29
3.0 Introduction 29
3.1 Research Design 29
3.2
Population of the Study 29
3.3
Sample and Sampling Technique 29
3.4
Research Instrument 30
3.5
Procedure for Data Collection 30
3.6
Data Analysis Procedure 30
CHAPTER FOUR:
Data Analysis and Discussion of Results 31
4.1 Introduction 31
4.2 Description of Bio-Data 31
4.3 Description of Students Response to the
Research Questions 34
4.4 Hypothesis Testing 40
4.5 Summary of Findings 44
4.6 Discussion of Findings 44
CHAPTER FIVE:
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations 48
5.1
Introduction 48
5.2
Summary of the Study 48
5.3
Conclusions 49
5.4
Recommendations 50
5.5
Suggestion for Further Studies 51
References 53
Appendix 56
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
to the Study
Facility means the
system which supports the operation of an organisation or an institution to
carry its daily activities and to promote growth and development in such
organisation or institution.
Facility refers to
the entire environment of the school or an organisation, it refers to both the
physical and material resources available to the students and teachers in the
school to facilitate their learning and teaching process. The classrooms; the
libraries and the laboratories for sciences are the three main areas of
facilities identified in the school system or environment. (Onyeji, 1990)
Facilities enhance
teaching and learning in schools. The state of facilities found in many
Nigerian schools is very discouraging. The shortage of classroom in many
schools is so acute than sixty pupils occupy classrooms that are meant for only
forty pupils. Library facilities, books, classrooms furniture, laboratories and
workshops are grossly inadequate. Urevbu (2006) has observed that the physical
environment of many primary schools in Nigeria presents a sorry sight with
dilapidated buildings, dingy classrooms devoid of seats and writing tables, and
dirty and non-functional or no toilets, the physical environment of such
primary schools is not conducive for learning.
The inadequacy of
facilities and learning resources is responsible for the decline in the quality
of primary education. equally worrisome is a sanitation where classrooms do not
have science laboratories, and a large number of pupils go to schools without
basic textbooks and other materials (Urevbu, 2006).
Mennhein and Steward
(2002) had identified overcrowded classrooms as one of the causes of poor
school performance and examination malpractices. Teaching and management also
become difficulty. It is a well-know fact that the facilities and equipment
currently available are inadequate for the education in Nigeria.
If education in Nigeria must
succeed, adequate classrooms have to be provided to accommodate the large
number of pupils to cope with the expected surge in demand for education at
both the primary and junior secondary levels of education. Furthermore, for the
successful implementation of the educational programmes, adequate planning need
to be done. The scheme should not be concerned with only quantitative aspects.
Libraries and books
give great assistance to both the teachers and the learners. In a situation
whereby our secondary school students are left with no choice to make their
text books as the only source of knowledge, the danger of exposing them to
obsolete knowledge in old books donated by the British Council several years
ago as one normally finds in the old secondary schools should not be
overlooked. According to Dada (1994), any one who is familiar with some
secondary school classrooms in Nigeria,
especially in Lagos
State, will agree that no
meaningful teaching/learning activities can effectively take place in most of
them, even if teachers are God-sent and the learners are pack of highly
intelligent personalities. The problem is that where there are classrooms, they
are overcrowded to the extent that classrooms originally meant for between 30
and 40 students, take between 60 and 80 students with a good number of them
sitting on windows. In this situation, neither the teacher nor the students can
move freely as expected in our secondary school classrooms. This is why many
teachers do not give assignments to such large number of students regularly as
expected. And this has affected students academic performance drastically.
On science
laboraories, Olarewaju (1994) claims that only few schools have science
laboratories which are well equipped to carry out scientific experiments in
courses such as biology, physics, and chemistry. A good number of schools teach
biology or chemistry as if they are non-science subjects without laboratory.
Some other schools which are so during, teach the three branches of science
without laboratories in the hope that they would use other schools,
laboratories during their examinations or compel students to contribute money
for purchase of science equipment through the school Parents Teachers
Association (PTA). It should be noted that the greater failure rate is in
science because our schools lack the essential science to the students but
rather, resort to the theoretical science without the use of laboratory. The
contention is that the nation has been unfair not only to students in our secondary
schools but also to herself. This s because no nation can develop technology
through theoretical teaching of science subjects, under poor educational
facilities, no meaningful teaching and learning can take place, and the normal
refrain in the educational circle is that all is well with our secondary
schools.